Chevrolet Evanda 2005 vs SAAB 9-5 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 131 HP | 250 HP | |
Torque: | 181 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Evanda engine produces 119 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 169 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Evanda reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.8 | |
Chevrolet Evanda consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Evanda over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.77 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
Chevrolet Evanda is 6 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Evanda is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Evanda is 0.4 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Chevrolet Evanda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Evanda has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |