Chevrolet Evanda 2005 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Evanda engine produces 19 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Evanda reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.2 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Evanda consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Evanda could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Evanda is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Evanda is 28 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Evanda is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Evanda is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Chevrolet Evanda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Evanda has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |