Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Toyota Highlander 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 - 301 HP | 187 - 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 - 369 NM | 186 - 337 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 10.8 seconds | 8.2 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 12.4 | 9.0 - 12.4 | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Highlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller. Chevrolet Equinox is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2282 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Equinox has 597 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Highlander. The Toyota Highlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`325 | ~ 2`626 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |