Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Toyota Highlander 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Equinox
2009 - 2015
Toyota Highlander
2007 - 2013
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Engines: 2.4 - 3.62.7 - 3.5

Performance

Power: 182 - 301 HP187 - 273 HP
Torque: 233 - 369 NM186 - 337 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 - 10.8 seconds8.2 - 9.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.0 - 12.49.0 - 12.4
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Highlander.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.79 m
Width: 1.84 m1.91 m
Height: 1.68 m1.76 m
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller.
Chevrolet Equinox is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Highlander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 889 litres292 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2282 litres
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Equinox has 597 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Highlander. The Toyota Highlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`325~ 2`626
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Equinox has
  • roomier boot
Toyota Highlander has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv