Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Mercedes ML 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Equinox is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes ML can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Equinox also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | 3.0 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 - 301 HP | 190 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 - 369 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 10.8 seconds | 5 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 12.4 | 8.4 - 16.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller. Chevrolet Equinox and Mercedes ML are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 551 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Equinox has 338 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`325 | ~ 2`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |