Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Lexus RX 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 - 301 HP | 188 - 299 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 - 369 NM | 252 - 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 10.8 seconds | 7.4 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 12.4 | 7.8 - 10.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus RX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Chevrolet Equinox and Lexus RX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 889 litres | 496 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1570 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Equinox has 393 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`325 | ~ 2`523 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 27 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Equinox has
|
Lexus RX has
| |