Chevrolet Equinox 2009 vs Lexus RX 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Equinox
2009 - 2015
Lexus RX
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Engines: 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol)2.7 - 3.5 (petrol, hybrid)

Performance

Power: 182 - 301 HP188 - 299 HP
Torque: 233 - 369 NM252 - 346 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 - 10.8 seconds7.4 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.0 - 12.47.8 - 10.6
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus RX.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.77 m4.77 m
Width: 1.84 m1.89 m
Height: 1.68 m1.71 m
Chevrolet Equinox and Lexus RX are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 889 litres496 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1570 litres
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Equinox has 393 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX.
Turning diameter: no data11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`325~ 2`523
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data27 600
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Equinox has
  • only petrol engines available
  • roomier boot
Lexus RX has
  • petrol and hybrid engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv