Chevrolet Equinox 2005 vs Mazda CX-9 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Equinox
2005 - 2009
Mazda CX-9
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Engines: 3.4 - 3.63.5

Performance

Power: 185 - 264 HP263 HP
Torque: 285 - 339 NM339 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 secondsn/a seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.0 - 11.011.5 - 12.7
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-9.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m5.07 m
Width: 1.81 m1.94 m
Height: 1.76 m1.73 m
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller, but slightly higher.
Chevrolet Equinox is 28 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Equinox is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 860 litres487 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2852 litres
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Equinox has 373 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-9. The Mazda CX-9 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 2`685
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data6600
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Equinox has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv