Chevrolet Equinox 2005 vs Infiniti FX 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Equinox
2005 - 2009
Infiniti FX
2003 - 2008
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Chevrolet Equinox is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Infiniti FX can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Equinox also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 3.4 - 3.63.5 - 4.5

Performance

Power: 185 - 264 HP280 - 328 HP
Torque: 285 - 339 NM366 - 466 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds6.3 - 7.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.0 - 11.012.1 - 14.1
Chevrolet Equinox petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Infiniti FX.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.81 m
Width: 1.81 m1.93 m
Height: 1.76 m1.65 m
Chevrolet Equinox is smaller, but higher.
Chevrolet Equinox and Infiniti FX are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 860 litres776 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1826 litres
Chevrolet Equinox has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Equinox has 84 litres more trunk space than the Infiniti FX.
Turning diameter: no data11.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 2`433
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data5200
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Equinox has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv