Chevrolet Epica 2006 vs SAAB 9-5 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 237 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Epica engine produces 29 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 43 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Epica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Epica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Epica engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Epica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Epica is 3 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Epica is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Epica has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |