Chevrolet Epica 2006 vs Audi A4 1999

 
Chevrolet Epica
2006 - 2010
Audi A4
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 156 HP165 HP
Torque: 237 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.6 seconds
Audi A4 is a more dynamic driving.
Chevrolet Epica engine produces 9 HP less power than Audi A4, but torque is 7 NM more than Audi A4. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Epica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.39.9
Real fuel consumption: 9.7 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Epica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway830 km on highway
640 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption
Chevrolet Epica gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 360'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A4 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years3 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on Audi A6
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.48 m
Width: 1.81 m1.73 m
Height: 1.45 m1.42 m
Chevrolet Epica is larger.
Chevrolet Epica is 32 cm longer than the Audi A4, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Epica is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres440 litres
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Epica has 40 litres more trunk space than the Audi A4.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Epica is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A4.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9851`915
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 24001400
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 7.2/10
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Epica has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Audi A4 has
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv