Chevrolet Epica 2007 vs SAAB 9-5 2007

 
Chevrolet Epica
2007 - 2010
SAAB 9-5
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds11 seconds
Chevrolet Epica and SAAB 9-5 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Chevrolet Epica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.67.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The SAAB 9-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Epica could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
800 km with real consumption1040 km with real consumption
SAAB 9-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 530'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Epica engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Opel Antara, Chevrolet CruzeUsed also on SAAB 9-3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Epica might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.84 m
Width: 1.81 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Epica is 4 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres500 litres
Chevrolet Epica has 20 litres less trunk space than the SAAB 9-5.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`800
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 24002600
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Epica has
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
SAAB 9-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv