Chevrolet Epica 2007 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Epica is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Epica engine produces 25 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 40 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Epica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Epica consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Epica could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Epica consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| SAAB 9-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Epica is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Epica is 16 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Epica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Epica has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |