Chevrolet Epica 2007 vs Skoda Superb 2002

 
Chevrolet Epica
2007 - 2010
Skoda Superb
2002 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP101 HP
Torque: 320 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds13.2 seconds
Chevrolet Epica is more dynamic to drive.
Chevrolet Epica engine produces 49 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Epica reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.15.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Epica could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Epica consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
940 km with real consumption1140 km with real consumption
Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.80 m
Width: 1.81 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Chevrolet Epica and Skoda Superb are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 480 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Epica is 1 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Chevrolet Epica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`600
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 24001800
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 9.0/10
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Epica has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Skoda Superb has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv