Chevrolet Epica 2007 vs Skoda Superb 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 101 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
Chevrolet Epica is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Epica engine produces 49 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Epica reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Epica could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Epica consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
940 km with real consumption | 1140 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
Chevrolet Epica and Skoda Superb are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Epica is 1 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Chevrolet Epica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 9.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Epica has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |