Chevrolet Epica 2007 vs Skoda Superb 2006

 
Chevrolet Epica
2007 - 2010
Skoda Superb
2006 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP140 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds9.9 seconds
Chevrolet Epica is more dynamic to drive.
Chevrolet Epica engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Superb, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Epica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.16.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.5 l/100km
The Skoda Superb is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Epica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Epica consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
940 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.80 m
Width: 1.81 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Chevrolet Epica and Skoda Superb are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres462 litres
Chevrolet Epica has 18 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Superb.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Epica is 1 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Chevrolet Epica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`600
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 24002000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Epica has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Skoda Superb has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv