Chevrolet Epica 2006 vs SAAB 9-5 2001

 
Chevrolet Epica
2006 - 2010
SAAB 9-5
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 141 HP150 HP
Torque: 195 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.8 seconds
Chevrolet Epica engine produces 9 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 45 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Epica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.29.2
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Epica consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Epica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway1010 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 8 years11 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on SAAB 9-3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. SAAB 9-5 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.83 m
Width: 1.81 m1.79 m
Height: 1.45 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Epica is 3 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Epica is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9851`800
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 24001200
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Epica has
  • lower fuel consumption
SAAB 9-5 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv