Chevrolet Cruze 2012 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2009
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Cruze 2012 and Chevrolet Cruze 2009 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Chevrolet Cruze 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Cruze 2009 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Cruze 2012 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze 2009, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Cruze 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Cruze 2012 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Cruze 2012 is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Cruze 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze 2009 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Cruze 2012 has 37 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze 2009. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`832 | 1`818 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Chevrolet Cruze has
| |