Chevrolet Cruze 2009 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 150 HP | 109 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 320 NM | 143 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.5 seconds | 9.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 8.3 | 6.1 - 8.4 | |
|
On average, the Chevrolet Cruze petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mitsubishi Lancer. On average, Chevrolet Cruze equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Cruze is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Cruze is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Cruze has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Cruze is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Chevrolet Cruze can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`828 | ~ 1`831 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |