Chevrolet Cruze 2012 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 141 HP | 100 - 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 200 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 13.5 seconds | 8.1 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.3 | 4.1 - 7.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Cruze is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Cruze is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1263 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Cruze has 49 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Cruze is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`834 | ~ 1`864 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Cruze has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |