Chevrolet Cruze 2012 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Cruze
2012 - 2015
Chevrolet Cruze
2009 - 2012
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol)1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 109 - 141 HP109 - 150 HP
Torque: 150 - 200 NM150 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 - 13.5 seconds10 - 13.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.7 - 8.35.8 - 8.3
Chevrolet Cruze 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Cruze 2009.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.60 m
Width: 1.80 m1.79 m
Height: 1.48 m1.51 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Cruze 2012 is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Cruze 2009, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Cruze 2012 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 413 litres450 litres
Chevrolet Cruze 2009 has more luggage space.
Chevrolet Cruze 2012 has 37 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Cruze 2009.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`834~ 1`828
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 62004000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Cruze has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Chevrolet Cruze has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv