Chevrolet Colorado 2006 vs Mazda BT-50 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 189 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 258 NM | 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Chevrolet Colorado engine produces 46 HP more power than Mazda BT-50, but torque is 72 NM less than Mazda BT-50. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 8.9 | |
The Mazda BT-50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Colorado consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda BT-50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Colorado could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Mazda BT-50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.26 m | 5.08 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
Chevrolet Colorado is 19 cm longer than the Mazda BT-50, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Colorado is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`030 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Colorado has
|
Mazda BT-50 has
| |