Chevrolet Colorado 2004 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Chevrolet Colorado
2004 - 2006
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Body: Crossover / SUVSedan
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.8 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 177 HP156 HP
Torque: 250 NM203 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Chevrolet Colorado engine produces 21 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Mazda 3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.39.4
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Colorado consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Colorado could require 285 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres44 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle460 km in combined cycle
700 km on highway540 km on highway
Chevrolet Colorado gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 5.26 m4.49 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.66 m1.47 m
Chevrolet Colorado is 77 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Colorado is 19 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 645 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1285 litres
Chevrolet Colorado has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Colorado has 232 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 84002200
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Colorado has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv