Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Mazda CX-7 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 251 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 149 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Despite less power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Captiva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Captiva is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 774 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Captiva has 22 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The Mazda CX-7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 803 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Captiva scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |