Chevrolet Captiva 2011 vs Mazda CX-7 2009

 
Chevrolet Captiva
2011 - 2013
Mazda CX-7
2009 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP173 HP
Torque: 251 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.1 seconds11.3 seconds
Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 149 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Despite less power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.57.5
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres69 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1040 km on highway
590 km with real consumption820 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.70 m
Width: 1.85 m1.87 m
Height: 1.73 m1.65 m
Chevrolet Captiva is smaller, but higher.
Chevrolet Captiva is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 8 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 97 litres455 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 97 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 477 litres455 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1577 litres774 litres
In 5-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 22 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 803 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`430
Safety:
Chevrolet Captiva scores higher in safety tests.
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 68006400
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Captiva has
  • higher safety
Mazda CX-7 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv