Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Captiva can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Antara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 31 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1752 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space (by 109 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 175 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.3 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |