Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs BMW X3 2010

 
Chevrolet Captiva
2013 - 2014
BMW X3
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 184 HP184 HP
Torque: 400 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds8.5 seconds
Chevrolet Captiva and BMW X3 have the same engine power, but Chevrolet Captiva torque is 20 NM more than BMW X3. Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.45.6
Real fuel consumption: 9.3 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Captiva could require 120 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Captiva consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway1340 km on highway
690 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption
BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 200 mm (7.9 inches)212 mm (8.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years17 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel AntaraInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.65 m
Width: 1.85 m1.88 m
Height: 1.76 m1.66 m
Chevrolet Captiva is 3 cm longer than the BMW X3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 10 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 97 litres550 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 97 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 477 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1577 litres1600 litres
In 5-seat version BMW X3 has more luggage space (by 73 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 23 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.3 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 0.6 metres more than that of the BMW X3, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`290
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
BMW X3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 840013 000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Captiva has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
BMW X3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv