Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 3 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 5 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite less power, Chevrolet Captiva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 9.6 | |
|
The Chevrolet Captiva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Captiva consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Captiva over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Captiva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chevrolet Captiva can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Chevrolet Captiva version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Chevrolet Captiva 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Malibu | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | no data | |
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 97 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 97 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 477 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1577 litres | 1752 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space (by 109 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 175 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`352 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |