Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Subaru Forester 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Captiva engine produces 11 HP more power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 2 NM less than Subaru Forester. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1598 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |