Chevrolet Captiva 2013 vs Subaru Forester 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Captiva is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Subaru Forester can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Captiva also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 147 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 198 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 11.1 seconds | 7.5 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 10.5 | 5.7 - 8.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. On average, Chevrolet Captiva equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is larger. Chevrolet Captiva is 7 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Captiva is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1598 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Captiva has 28 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. This could mean that the Chevrolet Captiva uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Captiva is 1.7 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Chevrolet Captiva can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`430 | ~ 2`055 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Captiva has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |