Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs Audi TT 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 22 HP less power than Audi TT, but torque is 25 NM more than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.4 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 88 cm longer than the Audi TT, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | 220 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 703 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`872 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Audi TT has
| |