Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs Volvo C70 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Volvo C70. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 9.7 | |
|
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo C70) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 19 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 262 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo C70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |