Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs Ford Mustang 1999
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang have the same engine power, but Chevrolet Camaro torque is 7 NM more than Ford Mustang. Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 12.0 | |
| Chevrolet Camaro consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 25 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
| |