Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 279 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 86 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Mercedes CLK. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Camaro reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 12.2 | |
| Chevrolet Camaro consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Camaro over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 34 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 16 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |