Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Audi A5 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 312 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Camaro engine produces 122 HP more power than Audi A5, but torque is 23 NM less than Audi A5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 6.7 | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Camaro consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Camaro could require 660 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 22 cm longer than the Audi A5, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 829 litres | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 135 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Audi A5 has
| |