Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 11.1 - 12.4 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi 3000 GT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.28 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 35 cm longer than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`872 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
| |