Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs Ford Probe 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Ford Probe can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 118 - 164 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 170 - 212 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 7.8 - 10.1 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Probe. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 34 cm longer than the Ford Probe, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`872 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Probe has
| |