Chevrolet Camaro 1997 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Chevrolet Camaro 1997 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Chevrolet Camaro 1998 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 11.7 - 12.4 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro 1997 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro 1998. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro 1997 and Chevrolet Camaro 1998 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 923 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`872 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |