Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs Ford Mustang 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 3.8 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 - 12.4 | 12.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 25 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
| |