Chevrolet Camaro 1998 vs BMW 3 series 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.8 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 143 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 200 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | 6.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 - 12.4 | 7.7 - 10.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 42 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 1.6 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |