Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Mercedes SL 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mercedes SL is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 3.0 - 5.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 315 - 430 HP | 306 - 585 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 556 NM | 370 - 900 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.2 - 5.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 11.0 | 6.8 - 9.9 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SL. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 22 cm longer than the Mercedes SL, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 241 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 381 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 79 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SL. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes SL, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mercedes SL has
| |