Chevrolet Camaro 2011 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 315 - 430 HP | 323 - 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 556 NM | 278 - 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 11.0 | 10.9 - 14.1 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro 2011 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro 2013. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.36 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro 2011 and Chevrolet Camaro 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro 2013 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Camaro 2011 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro 2013. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |