Chevrolet Camaro 2008 vs Chevrolet Impala 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Chevrolet Impala can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 3.5 - 5.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 312 - 426 HP | 214 - 307 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 - 420 NM | 290 - 438 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.0 - 10.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Impala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.49 m | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is 26 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 527 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chevrolet Camaro has 207 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`737 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |