Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 323 - 432 HP | 84 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 569 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 14.1 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 35 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 16 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 49 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`200 | ~ 1`796 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |