Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Ford Mustang 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 2.3 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 323 - 432 HP | 309 - 426 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 569 NM | 407 - 529 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 14.1 | no data | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro is 5 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 408 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 44 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 28 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |