Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Dodge Charger 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Dodge Charger is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available only with rear wheel drive, while Dodge Charger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 3.6 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 323 - 432 HP | 296 - 477 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 569 NM | 353 - 637 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 14.1 | 10.0 - 13.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is 24 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 467 litres | |
|
Dodge Charger has more luggage space. Chevrolet Camaro has 103 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |