Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with rear wheel drive, while Chevrolet Epica can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 323 - 432 HP | 141 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 569 NM | 195 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | 9.7 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 14.1 | 6.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Epica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 116 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`200 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |