Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 323 - 432 HP | 315 - 430 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 569 NM | 370 - 556 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 14.1 | 10.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro 2013 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro 2011. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro 2013 and Chevrolet Camaro 2011 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro 2013 has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro 2013 has 44 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro 2011. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |