Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Audi TT 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 323 - 432 HP | 230 - 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 569 NM | 370 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | 3.7 - 6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 14.1 | 5.9 - 8.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 5.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger. Chevrolet Camaro is 66 cm longer than the Audi TT, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 305 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 59 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.96 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`200 | ~ 1`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Audi TT has
| |