Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Renault Clio 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 84 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 114 NM | 93 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 24 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Renault Clio is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
620 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.42 m | |
Chevrolet Aveo is larger. Chevrolet Aveo is 11 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 255 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Aveo has 35 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Chevrolet Aveo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 6.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |