Chevrolet Aveo 2004 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 1 HP more power than Mazda 3, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.2 | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Lacetti, Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Nubira | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda MX-3, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato, Kia Carens | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Aveo is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 38 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |