Chevrolet Aveo 2004 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 94 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 131 NM | 120 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 12 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 27 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Lacetti, Chevrolet Kalos | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt, Mitsubishi Space Star | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Chevrolet Aveo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.31 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
Chevrolet Aveo is 17 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 430 litres | |
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 55 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.7/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |