Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Suzuki Swift 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 9 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 7 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Despite less power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.3 | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.54 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 18 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 198 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | 562 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Aveo has 23 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. This could mean that the Chevrolet Aveo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Aveo (by 418 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |